Israeli Scientists Revolutionize Cancer Treatment with Discovery of Genetic ‘Scissors’

A revolutionary approach that has precisely snipped away cancerous DNA in animal trials, may be introduced in two years to fight human cancers.

According to The Times of Israel, scientists at Israel’s Tel Aviv University have discovered what they call “a more elegant chemotherapy,” through “genome editing technology.”

Dan Peer, a professor and cancer expert at the university, described the “CRISPR genome editing system,” as RNA shearing DNA like “tiny scissors.”

“This is the first study in the world to prove that the CRISPR genome editing system, which works by cutting DNA, can effectively be used to treat cancer in an animal,” Peer told The Times.

“If we can use this technology, then within three treatments we can destroy a tumor,” Peer added. “This technology can physically cut the DNA in cancerous cells, and those cells will not survive.”

TRENDING: “Dark Winter” Was The Code Name For A Scenario In Which A Biological Weapon Was Used Against The American Populace

Peer’s study, already reviewed by fellow scientists and published on Nov. 18 in Science Advances, explained although “molecularly targeted inhibitors and immunotherapy have greatly improved cancer responses with reduced toxicity and adverse reactions,” individuals administered cancer treatment often experience “drug resistance” and “repeated administration, which increases treatment-related toxicity and treatment cost and severely reduces patient quality of life.”Drug resistance” and “repeated administration, which increases treatment-related toxicity and treatment cost and severely reduces patient quality of life.”

However, with the technology’s application, “the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has the potential to permanently disrupt tumor survival genes, which could overcome the repeated dosing limitations of traditional cancer therapies, improve treatment efficacy, and require fewer treatments,” according to Science Advances.

Peer and his colleagues Daniel Rosenblum and Anna Gutkin explained more in a video presentation.

Rosenblum said CRISPR “enables us to basically modify and disrupt any gene of interest in any cell type we want.”

Gutkin said the research honed in what she called the two “most aggressive” cancers, ovarian and glioblastoma.

“Glioblastoma is the most aggressive type of brain cancer, with a life expectancy of 15 months after diagnosis and a five-year survival rate of only 3%,” The Times reported.

“We really believe we can treat not only these diseases but open new avenues for new therapeutics for other cancers and other genetic diseases,” Gutkin added.

TRENDING: The Way Hollywood Liberals Just Changed ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ Will Make You Angry

Peer said over 500 types of cancers exist, some possessing “unique genetic hallmarks,” for which he hoped the CRISPR genome could be applied.

Based on the team’s studies, Peer asserted in the video, if used no more than three times, CRISPR could “probably be effective enough in order to extend survival but also improve the quality of life.”

“When we first spoke of treatments with messenger RNA twelve years ago, people thought it was science fiction,” Peer told The Times. “I believe that in the near future, we will see many personalized treatments based on genetic messengers, for cancer and various genetic diseases.”

In a Nov. 21 interview with Israel’s i24 News, Peer compared the CRISPR genome’s strategy similar to the coronavirus vaccines currently undergoing trials, calling those inoculations “messenger RNA-based vaccines.”

Peer said the CRISPR genome has a more sophisticated “GPS” type of delivery, in that it “can easily identify the cancer cells and not the healthy cells.”

“These technologies will be able to change medicine because we will be able to use the same industrial processes, in order to use it not only for vaccines but for therapeutics,” Peer said.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post Israeli Scientists Revolutionize Cancer Treatment with Discovery of Genetic ‘Scissors’ appeared first on 0Censor.

“Dark Winter” Was The Code Name For A Scenario In Which A Biological Weapon Was Used Against The American Populace

Could it be possible that the phrase “dark winter” has some sort of deeper meaning that most of us are not meant to understand? We have heard that phrase over and over again in recent weeks, and usually, it has been used in discussions regarding the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic. But it also turns out that “Dark Winter” was also a code name for a high-level simulation that was conducted back in 2001. That simulation envisioned a scenario in which a widespread smallpox attack was unleashed inside the United States. As you will see below, the simulation was “designed to spiral out of control”, and the hypothetical consequences were absolutely disastrous.

The reason why this is a concern is because so many of these “simulations” and “exercises” end up mirroring real-life events that happen at a later date.

TRENDING: The Way Hollywood Liberals Just Changed ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ Will Make You Angry

For example, most of you have probably heard about Event 201 by now.  On October 18th, 2019 a group of prominent individuals gathered in New York City to simulate what would happen during a worldwide coronavirus pandemic

Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

Of course, COVID-19 started spreading in China just a few weeks later.

We have seen this same pattern happen so many times, and now we are being told over and over again that a “dark winter” is ahead.

For example, Joe Biden specifically warned us about a “dark winter” during the final presidential debate in October

Joe Biden warned at Thursday night’s presidential debate that the U.S. was “about to go into a dark winter,” echoing the concerns of public health experts who caution about increased daily Covid-19 case counts converging with the annual flu season.

“We’re about to go into a dark winter. A dark winter,” Biden said. “And he has no clear plan, and there’s no prospect that there’s going to be a vaccine available for the majority of the American people before the middle of next year.”

It is interesting to note that he repeated the phrase twice.

TRENDINGDominion Rep Who Scanned Ballots in Georgia County Where Thousands of Trump Votes Were Uncounted Also Worked for Kamala Harris

It is almost as if he was determined to make sure that he said it correctly.

And then he started using the phrase over and over again on the campaign trail and he kept using it even after the voting was over.

For example, here is an instance where he used the phrase on the Monday after the election

Joe Biden on Monday warned that a “very dark winter” is approaching as the U.S. coronavirus case count nears 10 million.

“There is a need for bold action to fight this pandemic,” Biden said in Delaware. “We’re still facing a very dark winter.”

I never thought too much about his use of that phrase, but could it be possible that it is actually some sort of a code word or signal?

We do know that it was a code word for a high level exercise that was held in 2001.  The following comes from Wikipedia

Operation Dark Winter was the code name for a senior-level bio-terrorist attack simulation conducted on June 22–23, 2001.[1][2][3] It was designed to carry out a mock version of a covert and widespread smallpox attack on the United States. Tara O’Toole and Thomas Inglesby of the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies (CCBS) / Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and Randy Larsen and Mark DeMier of Analytic Services were the principal designers, authors, and controllers of the Dark Winter project.

It is interesting to note that smallpox is a highly infectious disease that involves sores appearing on the skin.

For those that have read my latest book, you already understand why that detail is so important to me.

And as I already mentioned above, this exercise was specifically designed “to spiral out of control”

Dark Winter’s simulated scenario involved an initial localized smallpox attack on Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, with additional smallpox attack cases in Georgia and Pennsylvania. The simulation was then designed to spiral out of control. This would create a contingency in which the National Security Council struggles to determine both the origin of the attack as well as deal with containing the spreading virus. By not being able to keep pace with the disease’s rate of spread, a new catastrophic contingency emerges in which massive civilian casualties would overwhelm America’s emergency response capabilities.

Could it be possible that Biden and others are using the phrase “dark winter” to signal that something is about to spiral out of control?

RELATEDTrump Vows Not To Execute National Lockdown, Promises COVID Vaccine Soon

I don’t know.  I am just asking the question.

In Operation Dark Winter, the spread of smallpox also resulted in a “massive loss of civilian life”

The disastrous contingencies that would result in the massive loss of civilian life were used to exploit the weaknesses of the U.S. health care infrastructure and its inability to handle such a threat. The contingencies were also meant to address the widespread panic that would emerge and which would result in mass social breakdown and mob violence. Exploits would also include the many difficulties that the media would face when providing American citizens with the necessary information regarding safety procedures. Discussing the outcome of Dark Winter, Bryan Walsh noted “The timing–just a few months before the 9/11 attack–was eerily prescient, as if the organizers had foreseen how the threat of terrorism, including bioterrorism, would come to consume the U.S. government and public in the years to come.”[4]

So let me try to summarize what we have learned.

Operation Dark Winter envisioned a scenario in which a highly infectious disease that causes sores on the skin spirals out of control and causes a “massive loss of civilian life”.

And suddenly Joe Biden and other elitists have begun repeating this phrase over and over again as we head into 2021.

Be sure to bookmark this page so that you can refer back to it later.

Reality is often stranger than fiction, and the table has been set for some really, really strange things to happen.

From The Washington Standard written by Michael Snyder

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Michael Snyder

Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the University of Florida law school and he worked as an attorney in the heart of Washington D.C. for a number of years. Today, Michael is best known for his work as the publisher of The Economic Collapse Blog. Michael and his wife, Meranda, believe that a great awakening is coming and are working hard to help bring renewal to America. Michael is also the author of the book The Beginning Of The End

The post “Dark Winter” Was The Code Name For A Scenario In Which A Biological Weapon Was Used Against The American Populace appeared first on 0Censor.

The Way Hollywood Liberals Just Changed ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ Will Make You Angry

The charity table read is easily the bane of 2020.

If you aren’t familiar with the phenomenon, here’s a primer: Because we’re so starved for entertainment, Hollywood assumes we’re in a position to pay money to watch a bunch of stars does a dramatic reading of a movie script over video conference. Thus, we round up a motley crew of bored talent, either from the original work or fresher faces — usually playing against type — to engage in a Zoom re-enactment of a film you used to love.

Except without the picture. Or the music. Or the special effects.

The hook is supposed to be a demonstration of Tinseltown bonhomie, a reminder that we’re all in this together. Turn that frown upside-down, America — here’s Jennifer Aniston, Jimmy Kimmel, Morgan Freeman, Shia LaBeouf and others in a table read of “Fast Times at Ridgemont High!” (I wish I were making that up, but this is our reality now.)

At least there’s nothing culturally sacrosanct about a high school sex/stoner comedy from the 1980s, one that Freeman can only improve. When you’re talking about “It’s a Wonderful Life,” things are different.

TRENDING: Dominion Rep Who Scanned Ballots in Georgia County Where Thousands of Trump Votes Were Uncounted Also Worked for Kamala Harris

Particularly when you’re talking about Pete Davidson as George Bailey.

Yes, according to Deadline, the 27-year-old Davidson — best known for his time on “Saturday Night Live” and his active dating life — will take the role played by Jimmy Stewart in the 1946 original.

“We are so thrilled to have Pete reenact the role of George in It’s a Wonderful Life with his talented wit and clever vocalizations,”  Matthew Asner of The Ed Asner Family Center, which is putting on the Dec. 13 production, said in a statement Monday.

The cast includes several other stars you know and tolerate, such as Mia Farrow, Ellie Kemper, Carol Kane, Ed Begley Jr., Bill Pullman and Michael Shannon.

It’s Davidson’s casting, however, that’s raising the most eyebrows — and not just because Jimmy Stewart’s George Bailey was never quite known for his “talented wit and clever vocalizations.”

You might remember Davidson for his infamous remark about Texas GOP Rep. Dan Crenshaw’s eye patch in a 2018 episode of “Saturday Night Live”: “You may be surprised to hear he’s a congressional candidate from Texas and not a hitman in a porno movie,” Davidson said, followed by, “I’m sorry. I know he lost his eye in war — or whatever.”

You may also remember his on-air apology afterward.

What you might not remember is that he un-apologized for that: “I didn’t think I did anything wrong,” he said during his 2020 Netflix comedy special, according to The Hill. “It was like words that were twisted so that a guy could be famous. … So I made fun of this guy with an eye patch and then, like, I kind of got forced to apologize.”

You might also not remember this joke he made about R&B singer R. Kelly, who stands accused of numerous counts of sexual abuse, mostly against young women: “This guy is a monster, and he should go to jail forever,” Davidson said on SNL in March of 2019. “But if you support the Catholic Church, isn’t that like the same thing as being an R. Kelly fan? I don’t really see the difference, except for one’s music is significantly better.”

RELATED: Coca-Cola, Nike Push Back On Legislation That Would Crack Down On Forced Labor In China

That line, according to The Washington Post, “drew some titters and stunned ‘oooooohs’ from the audience.” When the audience of “Saturday Night Live” is genuinely shocked about a joke Pete Davidson made about the Catholic church, I would posit there are issues with it.

This isn’t to say Davidson is an unalloyed villain. He’s been admirably open about his struggles with mental-health issues. He’s done charity for firefighting causes, having lost his father, a New York City firefighter, on 9/11. But that still doesn’t make him George Bailey material, something Twitter took note of:

Maybe that last one will get Hollywood’s attention in regard to just how bad of an idea this is, provided any of them can remember a Pauly Shore movie.

What we should probably remember in regard to recasting “It’s a Wonderful Life” is just how outsized of a shadow the film casts over American holiday lore. Mostly forgotten until a legal quirk meant it entered the public domain in the 1970s, the film has been shown repeatedly on television during the Christmas season, turning it into a holiday classic.

It’s a film with an explicitly Christian message about family, faith, and priorities, something that’s an anachronism in the liberal Hollywood of today. In no small part, it works because Jimmy Stewart is George Bailey. It was hardly a reach to cast him in the role.

As for Davidson, this is casting against type with an actor who’s shown no competence getting outside his comfort zone. Not only that, but it’s casting that feels like it’s being done solely because it generates buzz around the production. All publicity is good publicity, at least as far as table reads go.

Yes, it’s just a table read. It’s an expensive one, with tickets going from $50 to $250 to watch Davidson and Co. perform over Zoom. The original movie can be streamed on Amazon Prime or purchased for far less than those tickets on any number of digital services.

If you still have $50 to $250 lying around, give it to a charity that doesn’t feel the need to vulgarize “It’s a Wonderful Life” because it wants your money.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post The Way Hollywood Liberals Just Changed ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ Will Make You Angry appeared first on 0Censor.

Dominion Rep Who Scanned Ballots in Georgia County Where Thousands of Trump Votes Were Uncounted Also Worked for Kamala Harris

A Dominion representative who has been scanning ballots in Floyd County, Georgia, appears to have worked as an official photographer for Kamala Harris’ campaign last year.

Over 3,000 votes, the majority of which were for President Trump, went initially uncounted in the county.

TRENDING: Coca-Cola, Nike Push Back On Legislation That Would Crack Down On Forced Labor In China

Aric Thompson, Dominion representative and one of the men scanning ballots there worked as an official photographer for Senator Harris in 2019, according to his LinkedIn profile. He even has a portfolio online with photos he took of her.

“This is one of 2 men scanning in ballots in Floyd County. He worked for Kamala Harris. According to Rome City Commissioner Democrat Wendy Davis, & Floyd County GOP Chair Luke Martin, no observers were present for some of the scanning. Over 3000 uncounted votes found,” Real America’s Voice News reporter Heather Mullins tweeted.

TRENDING: PA State Senator Reminds Everyone What Happens if ‘Mounting Evidence’ Proves Election Was Compromised

Mullins also shared social media posts from Thompson in which he bashed President Donald Trump.

Earlier this month, the Board of Elections in Georgia’s Floyd County voted to fire Chief of Elections Clerk Robert Brady after officials found thousands of uncounted ballots.

Fox reports that “Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger blamed the problem on Floyd County election officials failing to upload votes from a memory card in a ballot-scanning machine.”

From Gateway Pundit by Cassandra Fairbanks

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post Dominion Rep Who Scanned Ballots in Georgia County Where Thousands of Trump Votes Were Uncounted Also Worked for Kamala Harris appeared first on 0Censor.

Coca-Cola, Nike Push Back On Legislation That Would Crack Down On Forced Labor In China

Major corporations Nike and Coca-Cola are reportedly pushing back on legislation that would crack down on forced labor in China.

The New York Times reported Sunday that the two companies have joined several others in an effort to put pressure on Congress “to weaken a bill that would ban imported goods made with forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region.”

RELATED: PA State Senator Reminds Everyone What Happens if ‘Mounting Evidence’ Proves Election Was Compromised

The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act has bipartisan support in Congress and is designed to ban certain goods that are produced in China with the aid of forced labor, particularly at the expense of religious minorities like the Uyghur Muslims.

Its passage would also force corporations to place their own supply chains under a proverbial microscope in order to ensure that they’re avoiding suppliers who utilized such labor sources.

Tech giant Apple and even the United States Chamber of Commerce have also pushed back on the legislation, according to The New York Times.

But the legislation, called the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, has become the target of multinational companies including Apple whose supply chains touch the far western Xinjiang region, as well as of business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Lobbyists have fought to water down some of its provisions, arguing that while they strongly condemn forced labor and current atrocities in Xinjiang, the act’s ambitious requirements could wreak havoc on supply chains that are deeply embedded in China.

Coca-Cola has been linked to sugar suppliers in the Xinjiang region, and Nike has been tied to a Qingdao factory that reportedly employed Uyghur workers.

RELATED: BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Timothy Batten Issues Order to Freeze All Dominion Machines in Georgia!

Both companies have pushed back on the suggestion that they would allow forced labor in order to keep their suppliers. Coca-Cola released a statement saying that the company “strictly prohibits any type of forced labor in our supply chain” and used third-party auditors to ensure that their standards were being upheld. The last audit, which the company said was successful, took place in 2019.

Nike stated in March of this year that the Qingdao factory did not import source materials and had stopped hiring Uyghurs from the Xinjiang region in 2019. A report also published in March by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute stated that in 2019, the factory employed some 800 Uyghurs and produced more than seven million pairs of shoes.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post Coca-Cola, Nike Push Back On Legislation That Would Crack Down On Forced Labor In China appeared first on 0Censor.

PA State Senator Reminds Everyone What Happens if ‘Mounting Evidence’ Proves Election Was Compromised

A Republican state senator from Pennsylvania suggested the state legislature might be inclined to throw out the commonwealth’s presidential election results if the election is shown to have been “compromised.”

State Sen. Doug Mastriano indicated Saturday on Twitter that some Pennsylvania Republicans are considering a maneuver that would let the legislature select its own delegates to the Electoral College.

Citing “mounting evidence” of “corruption,” Mastriano laid out the legal basis for such a move.

In a thread on Twitter, the Republican signaled he and other Pennsylvania lawmakers take allegations of fraud and other voting irregularities seriously.

“There is mounting evidence that the PA presidential election was compromised,” Mastriano wrote.

TRENDING: BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Timothy Batten Issues Order to Freeze All Dominion Machines in Georgia!

“If this is the case, under Article II, Section 1.2 of the US Constitution, the state legislature has the sole authority to direct the manner of selecting delegates to the Electoral College,” he added.

Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads: “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.”

In a separate tweet, Mastriano cited a potential need to void the election results so as to prevent voters from becoming disenfranchised.

“This power was given to the state legislature for the purpose of safeguarding the appointment of our President, specifically contemplating corruption and ensuring that the people are not disenfranchised through a corrupt election process,” he wrote.

Mastriano indicated he intends to push for the Republican-controlled legislature to appoint its own delegates should the election be shown to have been “compromised,” rather than allow the disputed results, which show Democrat Joe Biden winning the state, to stand.

RELATED: What Happens If Trump overturns a state or more, no one reaches 270 electoral votes?

“Therefore, we are introducing a Resolution to exercise our obligation and authority to appoint delegates to the Electoral College,” he tweeted.

President Donald Trump’s legal team has alleged widespread election fraud in the state. While there have been multiple alleged instances of voting irregularities in Pennsylvania and elsewhere, proof has yet to surface of widespread nefarious activity that affected the final results of the presidential election.

The Pennsylvania Republican made the announcement on Twitter a day after a Pennsylvania judge defended her decision to order a temporary halt to any actions to certify the state’s 2020 presidential election results pending a hearing on a lawsuit that seeks to void millions of potentially unconstitutional mail-in ballots.

Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough explained her reasoning for halting the certification process in a memorandum opinion on Friday.

Her Wednesday ruling had recognized legal issues with the mail-in ballots, rather than any arguments pertaining to alleged voter fraud.

A group of state Republicans, including Rep. Mike Kelly and 2020 congressional candidate Sean Parnell, filed a lawsuit claiming the state’s 2019 expansion of “no-excuse” mail-in voting “violated the state constitution’s limits on who can cast an absentee ballot,” Law360 reported.

“Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment,” McCullough wrote Friday.

“Since this presents an issue of law which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim.”

Under Pennsylvania law, any voter can choose to vote by mail, but to qualify for an absentee ballot, Pennsylvania voters must provide a valid reason to request such a ballot.

Act 77, which was signed into law in October 2019, created no excuse mail-in voting for all Pennsylvania voters and a 50-day period for voters to request and submit these ballots.

According to the lawsuit, these ballots should be deemed “unconstitutional” because Act 77 overrides legal limitations on absentee voting.

“Act 77 is the most expansive and fundamental change to the Pennsylvania voting code, implemented illegally, to date,” the plaintiffs wrote.

“[It] is another illegal attempt to override the limitations on absentee voting prescribed in the Pennsylvania Constitution, without first following the necessary procedure to amend the constitution to allow for the expansion.”

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post PA State Senator Reminds Everyone What Happens if ‘Mounting Evidence’ Proves Election Was Compromised appeared first on 0Censor.

BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Timothy Batten Issues Order to Freeze All Dominion Machines in Georgia!

Via Attorney Linn Wood: “Defendants are ordered to maintain the statue quo & are temporarily enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the State of Georgia until further order of the Court.”

This could be huge in the whole scheme of things; this will force the parties in charge of the election to freeze any machines used, to put them aside for possible electronic forensic search.

In what is an unusual but not surprising move, this was ruled today due to the time restraints with the deadline to certify votes coming up in less than 10 days.

General Michael Flynn weighed in.

This will prevent Georgia from resetting or wiping out their machines, will then leave them open for investigation for any irregularities. It also forces the states to keep the machines in limbo, so all votes can be checked that were running through them.

We are watching the wall by the dikes against the truth the Democrats put up. As more and more is revealed, these walls are cracking; one has to wonder, how long until they fail?

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Timothy Batten Issues Order to Freeze All Dominion Machines in Georgia! appeared first on 0Censor.

Moorish Sovereign Citizens, Claiming Sovereignty Are Going To Homes, Telling Owners To get Out

New African American group domestic terrorist group terrorizing citizens. Moorish Sovereign Citizens are going to homeowners, trying to evict them, claiming they have a legal right to take property.

Police are warning Seattle-area homeowners about a group that is knocking on the doors of pricey waterfront properties claiming to be their rightful owners — and in one case, told a woman she was being evicted.

The individuals identify themselves as Moorish Sovereign Citizens, CBS Seattle affiliate KIRO-TV reported. The group believes they are independent of any government interference and own all the land between Alaska and Argentina, according to Edmonds police Sgt. Josh McClure.

TRENDING: ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Leader at Race Conference Says It’s Time To ‘Kill the White Man’

“They have basically come to say that they’re from this particular group and they’re there to repossess the home and want the people to vacate the premises,” McClure said.

In recent weeks, Moorish Sovereign Citizens has been targeting homes that were put up for sale in Snohomish County, just outside Seattle, but have run similar scams in other parts of the country.

In 2013, a man broke into a $6 million mansion in Maryland. When police showed up, he claimed he was a Moorish Sovereign Citizen and produced paperwork he said proved his ownership.

Snohomish County in Washington State is near Puget Sound.
Snohomish County in Washington State is near Puget Sound. (Shutterstock.com)

In Maryland, one member of the group moved into a 12-bedroom, 35,000-square-foot mansion in Bethesda, Md., which was up for sale, according to a 2013 CBS report.

“Lamont Butler, aka Lamon Maurice L., claimed the mansion for himself,” according to the report. “He even provided documents by the so-called Moorish National Republic to back it up.”

TRENDING: Facebook fact-checker forced to issue correction after Candace Owens challenged ‘false’ rating

It turns out demanding the government support them is not enough. This is just more put out by the same people that brought you CHAD; they think they have a right to demand what is not theirs, all while claiming they were somehow victimized and they have a right to take as compensation for slavery or something else.

One has to wonder if they went to where AOC, Pelosi, or Schumer lived, would they vacate their homes to give them residence? Or maybe we can give Maxine Waters’ address. I am sure she will pull out to make sure their demands are met.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post Moorish Sovereign Citizens, Claiming Sovereignty Are Going To Homes, Telling Owners To get Out appeared first on 0Censor.

‘Anti-Hate’ Group Leader at Race Conference Says It’s Time To ‘Kill the White Man’

In 2020, white supremacist racism is roundly denounced and condemned by an overwhelming majority of civilized countries around the world.

Far-left, anti-white racism, however, continues to be fully embraced by the left.

The most recent example of this comes from Mamadou Ba, the head of SOS Racismo, a Portuguese anti-hate group.

At a recent online conference on “hate speech,” Ba explained the necessity to “kill the white man, murderer, colonial and racist” in order to “avoid the death of the black political subject” as reported by Correio da Manhã, a Portuguese daily newspaper.

TRENDING: Facebook fact-checker forced to issue correction after Candace Owens challenged ‘false’ rating

The Portuguese outlet went on to explain that Ba was quoting (presumably in agreement) Frantz Fanon, a French philosopher who specialized in the “psychopathology of colonization.”

The conference, which took place on Nov. 21, was dedicated to the theme of “Racism and the Advancement of Hate Speech in the World.”

In other words, this conference was yet another example of left-wing racism masquerading as progressive “anti-racism.”

Anti-racism, the philosophy which activists such as Mamadou Ba advance, has been known to promote racial bigotry and racial stereotypes of this exact sort.

In fact, the tenets of anti-racism are quite contradictory to the philosophy’s namesake.

Ironically, many of those core ideas line up with the bigotted principles of white supremacy.

For example, anti-racism forwards the idea that attributes such as “rugged individualism,” “self-reliance,” hard work and respect for authority are all examples of “whiteness.”

Additionally, anti-racism requires its followers to be constantly thinking about race in every interaction people have with one another.

Treating individuals equally without regard for their skin color, an idea known as colorblindness, is considered to be incredibly problematic by anti-racists.

TRENDING: Pennsylvania Supreme Court throws out GOP campaign lawsuit deemed ‘likely to succeed’ by judge

This is merely a facade used by white people to uphold their system of white supremacy, according to the strange ideology of anti-racist activists.

In the end, this ideology is teaching the exact opposite of what it claims — that people should be judged and treated differently based on whatever their racial identity happens to be.

Leftists are correct when they claim that racism is on the rise again.

Sadly, they fail to realize that they’re the ones responsible.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Leader at Race Conference Says It’s Time To ‘Kill the White Man’ appeared first on 0Censor.

Facebook fact-checker forced to issue correction after Candace Owens challenged ‘false’ rating

‘I am taking every measure to fight these communists in the court room’

Political commentator Candace Owens challenged a “false” rating from a third-party Facebook fact-checker and she won.

Earlier this month, Owens announced that she was taking legal action against the fact-checkers used by social media platforms. Owens brought the case because she became tired of being censored on Twitter and Facebook by third-party fact-checkers and seeing fellow conservatives being silenced on social media.

TRENDING: Pennsylvania Supreme Court throws out GOP campaign lawsuit deemed ‘likely to succeed’ by judge

Owens retained a pair of lawyers to represent her in the lawsuit, including attorney Todd McMurtry, who was part of the legal team representing former Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann. Owens is reportedly suing fact-checkers from USA Today and Lead Stories, according to the Daily Wire.

“It is time to fact-check the fact-checkers,” Owens said. “I’m going to put these suckers through discovery and figure out what the relationship is that they have with Facebook.”

Owens launched a website titled “Fact-Check Zuck,” which says, “Our freedoms are being stripped away. The overlords of Big Tech are determining what Americans can and cannot say, share, like, and post.”

Political commentator Candace Owens challenged a “false” rating from a third-party Facebook fact-checker and she won.

Earlier this month, Owens announced that she was taking legal action against the fact-checkers used by social media platforms. Owens brought the case because she became tired of being censored on Twitter and Facebook by third-party fact-checkers, as well as seeing fellow conservatives being silenced on social media.

Owens retained a pair of lawyers to represent her in the lawsuit, including attorney Todd McMurtry, who was part of the legal team representing former Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann. Owens is reportedly suing fact-checkers from USA Today and Lead Stories, according to the Daily Wire.

“It is time to fact-check the fact-checkers,” Owens said. “I’m going to put these suckers through discovery and figure out what the relationship is that they have with Facebook.”

Come visit us, we never censor political differences, we debate, never silence!

Owens launched a website titled “Fact-Check Zuck,” which says, “Our freedoms are being stripped away. The overlords of Big Tech are determining what Americans can and cannot say, share, like, and post.”

“Support our legal efforts today as we fight back against Facebook’s fact-checkers, confronting those who are suppressing free speech, thought, and expression across our great country,” the site says.

“I wanted to show that these fact-checkers just lie, and they usually go unchecked because most people don’t have the money, don’t have the time, and don’t have the platform to go after them — and I have all three,” Owens said.

Owens celebrated her first victory in the case against the social media behemoths on Saturday.

“Weeks ago, @Facebook censored a post of mine which truthfully stated that @JoeBiden is NOT the President-elect,” Owens wrote on Saturday. “So I got lawyers involved. Conclusion? @PolitiFact uncensored the post & admitted that they LIED by rating my post false. The fact-checkers are lying for Democrats.”

“At 8 Months pregnant, I unfortunately cannot fight on the ground alongside patriots like I am used to, but I am taking every measure to fight these communists in the court room,” the conservative firebrand added. “It is my goal to expose these lying ‘fact-checkers’ one by one. @JoeBiden is NOT the President-elect.”

PolitiFact issued a correction and removed the false rating.

“Correction: PolitiFact originally labeled this video false in our capacity as a third-party fact-checker for Facebook,” PolitiFact wrote on Facebook on Nov. 25. “On Nov. 20, an appeal to that decision was made on behalf of Ms. Owens. PolitiFact approved the appeal on Nov. 20, determined that a correction was appropriate, and removed the false rating.”

TRENDING: ‘Establishment media’ demands suppression of so-called partisan sites in favor of ‘mainstream news’

Owens argued that Joe Biden is not technically the president-elect as of yet, he was only named as the president-elect by media outlets, which is not authorized to name the president-elect. Biden is projected to be the winner of the 2020 presidential election, but the president-elect will not officially be named until the Electoral College cast its votes on Dec. 14, once all states have officially certified their results.

President Donald Trump is currently challenging the results in the election and has filed several lawsuits in critical swing states.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

The post Facebook fact-checker forced to issue correction after Candace Owens challenged ‘false’ rating appeared first on 0Censor.