Victims Accuse Kamala Harris Of Covering Up Sex Abuse Of Children by Clergy

From the time she was picked by Joe Biden, Kamala Harris (D-CA), mainstream media has gone out of their way to cover up Harris’s radical ideology and paint her as a moderate that is so saintly she almost walks on water. It is sad the media on the left today is more interested in a narrative then the truth, for if they started to dig into Kamala Harris, they would find she has a terrible history as a prosecutor, one that put political interests over the need of her constituents.

She refused to pursue child molestation criminal cases against Catholic priests investigated by her predecessor, and when the victims asked her for help with their civil claims against those molesters, the victims say she covered up the evidence. Coincidently (if you believe in coincidences), Kamala Harris received substantial campaign donations from people and organizations associated with the accused molesters and their defense.

TRENDING: Chicago Agitators Attacked Cops, Dragged Policewoman Along Ground While Partner Struggled To Save Her

Peter Schwizer, the author of the book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite, unveils how Harris refused to pursue the case. And also exposes the fact that many of the law firms and lawyers who were representing the archdiocese on a variety of legal matters — including priests that had been identified as possible culprits — gave significant contributions to Harris’s political campaign. Some of them had never given gifts to a race like this before, but they came up with the cash for Kamala Harris.

As Schweizer wrote:

During her decade-and-a-half tenure as a chief prosecutor, Harris would fail to prosecute a single case of priest abuse and her office would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred, despite the protests of victims’ groups.

Harris’s predecessor as San Francisco district attorney, Terence Hallinan, was aware of and had prosecuted numerous Catholic priests on sexual misconduct involving children. And he had been gathering case files for even more… Hallinan’s office had launched an investigation and quickly discovered that the San Francisco Archdiocese had extensive internal records concerning complaints going back some seventy-five years. In the spring of 2002, Hallinan demanded the church turn them over to his office.

The archdiocese turned over the documents, documents that were terrible to behold. The papers are said to have revealed the names of 40 current and ex-priests. DA Hallinan took the materials in and proceeded to set up a prosecution to bring these priests to justice.

There was a problem, many of these cases were past what had been the statute of limitations, and when the California legislative branch moved to eliminate the statute of limitations, the supreme court overruled the new law. This enraged DA Hallinan so much that he was going to go a second route, release the information to the public; this way, even if they weren’t punished, their crimes would be known.

There came up one rather huge problem, Terence Hallinan was up for reelection, and his move to expose these people had many in high places unhappy. Local Catholic organizations went to Pelosi and others in both the state and local political offices and moved them to support his opposition, that would be Kamala Harris, this is shown in Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite:

Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations, but the money still came in large, unprecedented sums. Lawyer Joseph Russoniello represented the church on a wide variety of issues, including the handling of the church abuse scandal. He served on the Catholic Church’s National Review Board (NRB) of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. The purpose of the NRB was to review Catholic Church abuse cases. Russoniello was also a partner in the San Francisco law firm Cooley Godward. Russoniello donated the maximum amount by law to her campaign, $1,250, and his law firm added another $2,250. He also sat on Harris’s advisory council when she was San Francisco, district attorney. Another law firm, Bingham McCutcheon, which handled legal matters for the archdiocese concerning Catholic Charities, donated $2,825, the maximum allowed. Curiously, Bingham McCutcheon had only donated to two other candidates running for office in San Francisco before, for a total of $650. As with Russoniello, their support was unusual.

Another law firm, Arguedas, Cassman Francisco priest against abuse claims at the time. They donated $4,550 to Harris. The lawyer in the case, Cristina Arguedas, also served on Kamala Harris’s advisory council.

Beyond these law firms, board members of San Francisco Catholic archdiocese-related organizations and their family members donated another $50,950 to Harris’s campaign.

While there is no way we can prove this was a quid pro quo set up, but as the old saying goes, if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like one, it is almost certain to be a duck. The knowledge of civil suits, which could be in the hundreds of millions forced players on high to push to have District Attorney claim she was seeking to put child molesters in prison, but she shredded the out of date files, thus no justice was done. For example:

They’re full of shit,” said Joey Piscitelli [a victim] and the northwest regional director of Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), the largest and most active victims group. “You can quote me on that. They’re not protecting the victims.”

Rick Simons, an attorney who represented multiple victims of clergy abuse, also attacked Harris’s actions. Hiding the records “shows policy of ignoring the rights of children by one of the largest institutions of the city and county of San Francisco, and in the Bay Area.”

Once she was in office, D.A. Kamala Harris refused to do anything to help the victims in their civil actions. Interviewed by the liberal Intercept, the victims spoke bitterly of the refusal of Kamala Harris to help them after she promised she would, once she was elected she went back on her promise and refused to even speak with them when they asked for her help:

“It went from Terence Hallinan going hundred miles an hour, full speed ahead, after the Catholic Church to Kamala Harris doing absolutely nothing and taking it backwards hundred miles an hour,” said Joey Piscitelli, a sexual assault survivor, who a jury found had been molested as a student while attending Salesian College Preparatory, a Catholic high school in Richmond, California.

Piscitelli had met with Hallinan’s office to discuss his case and the ongoing investigation into the church. But, he said, when Harris took over, his access to the office was shut off and his requests for clergy abuse files were ignored. Piscitelli resorted to handing out flyers and picketing outside the district attorney’s office on San Francisco’s McAllister Street.

To add insult to injury, when Piscitelli asked Kamala Harris for help, sharing that this priest was working in the Saints Peter and Paul Church in the same city, a place that had him daily interacting with children, she refused to do a thing. Kamala Harris did not care that this priest was in position where he could molest children again.

Dominic De Lucca, a Burlingame, California, resident who says he was raped by a local priest when he was 12 years old, also said he was shocked that Harris declined to aggressively pursue clergy abuse cases and refused to release the files. “I remember Kamala Harris,” said De Lucca. “She didn’t want to have any meetings.” He went on, “She wanted the public to think this is an issue that happened years ago, that it doesn’t happen anymore. Let’s just move on.”

Terence McAteer, a resident of Nevada City, California, says he was raped as a child by Austin Peter Keegan, an infamous San Francisco priest. McAteer said he sees no value in Harris’s decision to conceal the clergy abuse files, which had been used to indict his abuser but remain secret to this day. “Why not tell the story?” said McAteer. “I have no problem with my file being released. I don’t have any great secrets. It’s already in the newspaper. I think the whole cloak of secrecy with the Catholic Church needs to be exposed.”

Several survivors of clergy abuse said they believed that Harris had declined to release the files in deference to the Catholic Church, which has historically held sway as a major political force in San Francisco.

You can see at the end of this article a interview by the Intercept with Kamala Harris.

Schweizer reported that “in April 2010, a journalist with the San Francisco Weekly asked for the records through California’s Public Records Act. Harris’s office denied the request, offering conflicting explanations as to why they could not provide them.

Even after Kamala Harris left office, the records couldn’t be shared because they disappeared “In 2019, I [Peter Schwiezer] requested those records through a California attorney. The San Francisco district attorney’s office responded that they no longer had them in their possession. Were they destroyed? Were they moved somewhere else? It remains a disturbing mystery.”

Look, the above story is crucial, especially in the context of the 2020 election.

It is another example of how the mainstream media covers for liberal candidates. If Kamala Harris were a Republican, the fact that she threw sexual abuse victims under the bus and seems to have done it for campaign donations would be front-page news in N.Y. Times and the Washington Post. It’s not like it was a secret, Peter Schweizer’s book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite was a best seller.

RELATED: Harris Changes Platform, Stances And Race Like A Chameleon

I don’t agree with Kamala Harris’ extreme leftist political positions, but IMHO this is much worse. How can any human being ignore the cries of sexual abuse victims? They were children for heaven’s sake. When she took over from Terence Hallinan, Kamala Harris had all the information to help the victims, but she did nothing except hide the evidence. Heck, the Democrats tried to impeach a president for making a phone call they didn’t like, but at their convention, they nominate a woman who covered up child molestation, for Vice President. That ranks only slightly higher than the molesters themselves.

Most of the information in this post came from Peter Schweizer’s book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite and from research by Jeff Dunetz.

This post doesn’t even cover everything the book reveals about Harris, and there’s much more. Via Peter’s meticulous research, his tome shows corrupt acts by Joe Biden, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders. Sherrod Brown, Amy Klobuchar, and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti.

The video below is the Intercept interview of Joey Piscitelli:

[embedded content]
About the author:
Tell us something about yourself.

Get involved!

Get Connected! 0Censor Community BETA

Come and join our community. Expand your network and get to know new people!

Comments

No comments yet